We're on a Netflix subscription now, so we're taking a chance with a bunch of movies that've passed us by this year. Last night's selection was “Mr. Woodcock.” Wow, what a terrible movie. The titular character is a sociopath who enjoys abusing the less-than-physically fit children in his P.E. class. Never are we given a reason to sympathize with the guy — he's a horrible human being. Seann William Scott works the whole movie trying to break up his mother's romance with Mr. Woodcock. But then, at the end,
If it's THAT bad, should I see it anyway, just to appreciate its awfulness?
BTW, we saw a good one the other day: August Rush. You have to completely suspend your disbelief, of course, as it's wildly impossible. Still, it definitely had its moments of beauty.
Patrick asks: “If it's THAT bad, should I see it anyway, just to appreciate its awfulness?”
Motormouth replies: No. It's not bad in the silly way that “Attack of the Killer Tomatoes” is bad. It's bad because the screenwriters either picked up or put down the crack pipe 3/4 of the way through the movie. The rest of it makes NO sense, and will probably just piss you off.